Selected Publications
- Monograph: “Areal Typology of Prefixal Perfectivization” (in Russian, Moscow, 2015)
- (together with Yury Lander) The Northwest Caucasian languages. In: Maria Polinsky (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Languages of the Caucasus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, 369–446. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190690694.013.3
- (Non)finiteness, constructions, and participles in Lithuanian. Linguistics 58-2 (2020), 379–424. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0045
- Multiple ergatives: From allomorphy to differential agent marking. Studies in Language 41-3 (2017), 717–780. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.3.06ark
- Marking of subjects and objects in Lithuanian non-finite clauses: A typological and diachronic perspective. Linguistic Typology 17-3 (2013), 397–437. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2013-0020
FRIAS Project
Argument flagging in head-marking languages: Types of interaction between argument-coding systems
The project aims at investigating cross-linguistic diversity in the domain of interaction between the two main morphological argument-coding systems found in human languages, flagging (case marking) and indexing (verbal agreement/cross-reference). More particularly, the goal of the project is to establish a typology of argument-flagging systems in languages possessing highly-developed head-marking with a focus on how the two systems of argument encoding are distributed and interact with each other, and to try to uncover functional and, where possible, diachronic motivations for the observed types of such interactions. The project will involve a construction of a database comprising ca. 300 languages from diverse language families and linguistic areas, as well as of a genealogically stratified sample based on this database in order to conduct quantitative analysis. The research questions addressed in the project include those not covered in the typological literature, e.g. patterns of matching vs. mismatching between flagging and indexing, the extent and motivation of double-marking of different argument roles, possibility of indexing of peripheral participants etc. I believe that a broad empirical investigation of the cross-linguistic variation in this domain will not only contribute to the better understanding of the workings and development of human language, but will also be potentially beneficial for interdisciplinary studies involving sophisticated linguistic data.